Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211
Article
Google Scholar
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Asante D, He Z, Adjei NO, Asante B (2020) Exploring the barriers to renewable energy adoption utilising MULTIMOORA-EDAS method. Energy Policy 142:111479
Article
Google Scholar
Asher V (2020) Smartphone users in India 2015–2025. Statista Report. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/467163/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-india/. Accessed 14 Jan 2021
Attour A, Burger-Helmchen T, Zhong J, Nieminen M (2015) Resource-based co-innovation through platform ecosystem: experiences of mobile payment innovation in China. J Strateg Manag 8(3):283–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0026
Article
Google Scholar
Aydin G, Burnaz S (2016) Adoption of mobile payment systems: a study on mobile wallets. J Bus Econ Finance 5(1):73–92
Google Scholar
Badi I, Pamucar D (2020) Supplier selection for Steelmaking Company by using combined Grey-MARCOS methods. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 3(2):37–48
Article
Google Scholar
Baydaş M, Elma OE (2021) An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: an application in Borsa Istanbul. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 4(2):257–279
Article
Google Scholar
Behzad M, Zolfani SH, Pamucar D, Behzad M (2020) A comparative assessment of solid waste management performance in the Nordic countries based on BWM-EDAS. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122008
Belton V, Gear T (1985) The legitimacy of rank reversal—a comment. Omega 13(3):143–144
Article
Google Scholar
Biswas S (2020) Exploring the implications of digital marketing for higher education using intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach. BIMTECH Bus Perspect 2(1):33–51
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Anand OP (2020) Logistics competitiveness index-based comparison of BRICS and G7 countries: an integrated PSI-PIV approach. IUP J Supply Chain Manag 17(2):32–57
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Pamucar D (2020) Facility location selection for b-schools in Indian context: a multi-criteria group decision based analysis. Axioms 9:3–77
Article
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Pamučar DS (2021) Combinative distance based assessment (CODAS) framework using logarithmic normalization for multi-criteria decision making. Serb J Manag. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm16-27758
Article
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Bandyopadhyay G, Guha B, Bhattacharjee M (2019) An ensemble approach for portfolio selection in a multi-criteria decision making framework. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2(2):138–158
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Pamucar D, Chowdhury P, Kar S (2021a) A new decision support framework with picture fuzzy information: comparison of video conferencing platforms for higher education in India. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021a/2046097
Biswas S, Pamucar D, Kar S, Sana SS (2021b) A new integrated FUCOM–CODAS framework with Fermatean fuzzy information for multi-criteria group decision-making. Symmetry 13(12):2430
Article
Google Scholar
Bobar Z, Božanić D, Djurić K, Pamučar D (2020) Ranking and assessment of the efficiency of social media using the fuzzy AHP-Z number model-fuzzy MABAC. Acta Polytech Hungarica 17:43–70
Article
Google Scholar
Chakraborty S, Das PP, Kumar V (2018) Application of grey-fuzzy logic technique for parametric optimization of non-traditional machining processes. Grey Syst Theory Appl 8(1):46–68
Article
Google Scholar
Chakraborty S, Chatterjee P, Das PP (2019) Cotton fabric selection using a Grey Fuzzy relational analysis approach. J Inst Eng India Ser E 100(1):21–36
Chatterjee P, Chakraborty S (2012) Materials selection using COPRAS and COPRAS-G methods. Int J Mater Struct Integr 6(2–4):111–133
Article
Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay A, Chatterjee R, Saha A (2017) A study to gauge consumer orientation towards E-Wallet service providers in urban India. Kindler J Army Inst Manag Kolkata XVII(1):17–32
Google Scholar
Chatterjee P, Banerjee A, Mondal S, Boral S, Chakraborty S (2018) Development of a hybrid meta-model for material selection using design of experiments and EDAS method. Eng Trans 66(2):187–207
Google Scholar
Chen LD, Nath R (2008) Determinants of mobile payments: an empirical analysis. J Int Technol Inf Manag 17(1):9–20
Google Scholar
Chithambaranathan P, Subramanian N, Gunasekaran A, Palaniappan PK (2015) Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach. Int J Prod Econ 166:163–176
Article
Google Scholar
Cuong BC, Kreinovich V (2013) Picture Fuzzy Sets-a new concept for computational intelligence problems. In: 2013 Third world congress on information and communication technologies (WICT 2013). IEEE, pp 1–6
Cuong BC, Kreinovich V (2014) Picture fuzzy sets. J Comput Sci Cybernet 30(4):409–420
Google Scholar
Cuong CB, Son HL (2015) Some selected problems of modern soft computing. Expert Syst Appl 42:51–66
Google Scholar
Dahlberg T, Guo J, Ondrus J (2015) A critical review of mobile payment research. Electron Commer Res Appl 14(5):265–284
Article
Google Scholar
Das P, Chakraborty S (2022) Application of grey correlation-based EDAS method for parametric optimization of non-traditional machining processes. Sci Iran 29(2):864–882. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2020.53943.3499
Das PP, Diyaley S, Chakraborty S, Ghadai RK (2019) Multi-objective optimization of wire electro discharge machining (WEDM) process parameters using grey-fuzzy approach. Periodica Polytechnica Mech Eng 63(1):16–25
Article
Google Scholar
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340
Article
Google Scholar
Dennehy D, Sammon D (2015) Trends in mobile payments research: a literature review. J Innov Manag 3(1):49–61
Article
Google Scholar
Dogra S, Pal M (2020a) Picture fuzzy matrix and its application. Soft Comput 24(13):9413–9428
Article
Google Scholar
Dogra S, Pal M (2020b) m-Polar picture fuzzy ideal of a BCK algebra. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13(1):409–420
Article
Google Scholar
Dogra S, Pal M (2021) Picture fuzzy subring of a crisp ring. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A 91(3):429–434
Article
Google Scholar
Duncombe R, Boateng R (2009) Mobile phones and financial services in developing countries: a review of concepts, methods, issues, evidence and future research directions. Third World Q 30(7):1237–1258
Article
Google Scholar
Dwivedi YK, Tamilmani K, Williams MD, Lal B (2014) Adoption of M-commerce: examining factors affecting intention and behaviour of Indian consumers. Int J Indian Cult Bus Manag 8(3):345–360
Article
Google Scholar
Ecer F (2018) Third-party logistics (3PLs) provider selection via fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model. Technol Econ Dev Econ 24(2):615–634
Article
Google Scholar
Ecer F, Pamucar D (2020) Sustainable supplier selection: a novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. J Clean Prod 266:121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981
Feng X, Wei C, Liu Q (2018) EDAS method for extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(8):2470–2483
Article
Google Scholar
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Flood D, West T, Wheadon D (2013) Trends in mobile payments in developing and advanced economies. Reserve bank of Australia, Australia
Ghorabaee MK, Zavadskas EK, Olfat L, Turskis Z (2015) Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26:435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
Ghorabaee MK, Zavadskas EK, Amiri M, Turskis Z (2016) Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection. Int J Comput Commun Control 11:358–371. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2557
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2017a) A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Comput Ind Eng 112:156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.017
Article
Google Scholar
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2017b) Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17184
Article
Google Scholar
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2017c) Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. E & M Ekonomie a Manag 20:48–68. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017c-1-004
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2018a) A dynamic fuzzy approach based on the EDAS method for multi-criteria subcontractor evaluation. Information 9:68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9030068
Article
Google Scholar
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2018b) A comparative analysis of the rank reversal phenomenon in the EDAS and TOPSIS methods. Econom Comput Econom Cybernet Stud Res 52(3):121–134
Google Scholar
Gupta S, Bandyopadhyay G, Bhattacharjee M, Biswas S (2019) Portfolio selection using DEA-COPRAS at risk–return interface based on NSE (India). Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 8(10):4078–4086
Article
Google Scholar
Hasheminasab H, Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Bitarafan M, Chatterjee P, Abhaji Ezabadi A (2019) The role of façade materials in blast-resistant buildings: an evaluation based on fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy EDAS. Algorithms 12:6–119
Article
Google Scholar
Hong S, Thong JY, Tam KY (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1819–1834
Article
Google Scholar
Huang KY, Jane CJ (2009) A hybrid model for stock market forecasting and portfolio selection based on ARX, grey system and RS theories. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5387–5392
Article
Google Scholar
Ilieva G (2018) Group decision analysis algorithms with EDAS for interval fuzzy sets. Cybernet Inf Technol 18(2):51–64
Google Scholar
Ilieva G, Yankova T, Klisarova-Belcheva S (2018) Decision analysis with classic and fuzzy EDAS modifications. Comput Appl Math 37(5):5650–5680
Article
Google Scholar
Jack W, Suri T (2011) Mobile money: the economics of M-PESA (No. w16721). National Bureau of Economic Research
Jovčić S, Simić V, Průša P, Dobrodolac M (2020) Picture fuzzy ARAS method for freight distribution concept selection. Symmetry 12(7):1062
Article
Google Scholar
Julong D (1982) Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 1(5):288–294
Article
Google Scholar
Julong D (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1(1):1–24
Google Scholar
Kahraman C, Ghorabaee MK, Zavadskas EK, Onar SC, Yazdani M, Oztaysi B (2017) Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 25(1):1–12
Article
Google Scholar
Kapoor KK, Dwivedi YK, Williams MD (2014) Conceptualising the role of innovation: attributes for examining consumer adoption of mobile innovations. Mark Rev 14(4):405–428
Article
Google Scholar
Kapoor A, Sindwani R, Goel M (2020) Mobile wallets: theoretical and empirical analysis. Glob Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920961254
Article
Google Scholar
Karasan A, Kahraman C (2018a) Interval-valued neutrosophic extension of EDAS method. In: Kacprzyk J, Szmidt E, Zadrozny S, Atanassov KT, Krawczak M (eds) Advances in fuzzy logic and technology 2017, vol 642, pp 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66824-6_31
Karaşan A, Kahraman C (2018b) A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals. Soft Comput 22(15):4891–4906
Article
Google Scholar
Karmakar P, Dutta P, Biswas S (2018) Assessment of mutual fund performance using distance based multi-criteria decision making techniques—an Indian perspective. Res Bull 44(1):17–38
Google Scholar
Kendall MG (1948) Rank correlation methods. Griffin
Google Scholar
Kuganathan KV, Wikramanayake GN (2014) Next generation smart transaction touch points. In: 14th International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTER). IEEE, pp 96–102. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7083886
Kumar D, Martin D, O'Neill J (2011) The times they are a-changin' mobile payments in India. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1413–1422
Kundakcı N (2019) An integrated method using MACBETH and EDAS methods for evaluating steam boiler alternatives. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 26(1–2):27–34
Article
Google Scholar
Leavitt N (2012) Are mobile payments ready to cash in yet? Computer 45(9):15–18
Article
Google Scholar
Li YY, Wang JQ, Wang TL (2019) A linguistic neutrosophic multi-criteria group decision-making approach with EDAS method. Arab J Sci Eng 44(3):2737–2749
Article
Google Scholar
Li Z, Wei G, Wang R, Wu J, Wei C, Wei Y (2020) EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(1):86–102
Article
Google Scholar
Liébana-Cabanillas F, Sánchez-Fernández J, Muñoz-Leiva F (2014) Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: the moderating effect of age. Comput Hum Behav 35:464–478
Article
Google Scholar
Liébana-Cabanillas F, Japutra A, Molinillo S, Singh N, Sinha N (2020a) Assessment of mobile technology use in the emerging market: analyzing intention to use m-payment services in India. Telecommun Policy 44(9):102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020a.102009
Liébana-Cabanillas F, García-Maroto I, Muñoz-Leiva F, Ramos-de-Luna I (2020b) Mobile payment adoption in the age of digital transformation: the case of Apple Pay. Sustainability 12(13):5443
Article
Google Scholar
Madan K, Yadav R (2016) Behavioural intention to adopt mobile wallet: a developing country perspective. J Indian Bus Res 8(3):227–244
Article
Google Scholar
Manikandan S, Jayakodi JM (2017) An empirical study on consumer’s adoption of mobile wallet with special reference to Chennai city. Int J Res Granthaalayah 5(5):107–115
Article
Google Scholar
Mei YC, Aun NB (2019) Factors influencing consumers’ perceived usefulness of M-Wallet in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Rev Integr Bus Econ Res 8:1–23
Google Scholar
Mittal S, Kumar V (2018) Adoption of Mobile Wallets in India: an analysis. IUP J Inf Technol 14(1):42–57
Google Scholar
Mukhametzyanov I (2021) Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 4(2):76–105
Article
Google Scholar
Nandi S, Banerjee P (2020) COVID-19: digital payments see uptick in user base. Live Mint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/covid-19-digital-payments-see-uptick-in-user-base-11584610255566.html
Önüt S, Kara SS, Işik E (2009) Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):3887–3895
Article
Google Scholar
Padiya J, Bantwa A (2018) Adoption of E-wallets: a post demonetisation study in Ahmedabad City. Pac Bus Rev Int 10(10):84–95
Google Scholar
Pal A, Herath T, Rao HR (2019) A review of contextual factors affecting mobile payment adoption and use. J Bank Financ Technol 3(1):43–57
Article
Google Scholar
Pal A, Herath T, De’ R, Rao HR (2020) Contextual facilitators and barriers influencing the continued use of mobile payment services in a developing country: insights from adopters in India. Inf Technol Dev 26(2):394–420
Pamucar D (2020) Normalized weighted geometric Dombi Bonferoni mean operator with interval grey numbers: application in multicriteria decision making. Rep Mech Eng 1(1):44–52
Article
Google Scholar
Pamučar D, Ćirović G (2015) The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Syst Appl 42(6):3016–3028
Article
Google Scholar
Pamučar DS, Božanić DI, Kurtov DV (2016) Fuzzification of the Saaty’s scale and a presentation of the hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model: an example of the selection of a brigade artillery group firing position in a defensive operation. Vojnotehnički Glasnik 64(4):966–986
Article
Google Scholar
Pamučar DS, Božanić D, Ranđelović A (2017) Multi-criteria decision making: an example of sensitivity analysis. Serb J Manag 12(1):1–27
Article
Google Scholar
Pamučar DS, Ćirović G, Božanić D (2019) Application of interval valued fuzzy-rough numbers in multi-criteria decision making: the IVFRN-MAIRCA model. Yugoslav J Oper Res 29(2):221–247
Article
Google Scholar
Pamucar D, Torkayesh AE, Biswas S (2022) Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04529-2
Article
Google Scholar
Peng XD, Liu C (2017) Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS, new similarity measure and level soft set. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32:955–968. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161548
Article
Google Scholar
Petter S, DeLone W, McLean ER (2013) Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. J Manag Inf Syst 29(4):7–62
Article
Google Scholar
Phonthanukitithaworn C, Sellitto C, Fong MWL (2015) User intentions to adopt mobile payment services: a study of early adopters in Thailand. J Internet Bank Commer 20(1):1–29
Google Scholar
Pousttchi K, Wiedemann DG (2007) What influences consumers’ intention to use mobile payments. LA Global Mobility Round table, 1–16
Pramanik PKD, Biswas S, Pal S, Marinković D, Choudhury P (2021) A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for resource selection in mobile crowd computing. Symmetry 13(9):1713
Article
Google Scholar
Sharma G, Kulshreshtha K (2019) Mobile wallet adoption in India: an analysis. IUP J Bank Manag 18(1):7–26
Google Scholar
Shin DH (2009) Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Comput Hum Behav 25(6):1343–1354
Article
Google Scholar
Si A, Das S, Kar S (2019) An approach to rank picture fuzzy numbers for decision making problems. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2(2):54–64
Article
Google Scholar
Singh N, Sinha N (2020) How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology. J Retail Consum Serv 52:101894
Article
Google Scholar
Singh N, Sinha N, Liébana-Cabanillas FJ (2020) Determining factors in the adoption and recommendation of mobile wallet services in India: analysis of the effect of innovativeness, stress to use and social influence. Int J Inf Manag 50:191–205
Article
Google Scholar
Sinha M, Majra H, Hutchins J, Saxena R (2019) Mobile payments in India: the privacy factor. Int J Bank Mark 37(1):192–209
Article
Google Scholar
Son LH (2016) Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering. Appl Soft Comput 46:284–295
Article
Google Scholar
Son LH (2017) Measuring analogousness in picture fuzzy sets: from picture distance measures to picture association measures. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16:359–378
Article
Google Scholar
Stanujkic D, Zavadskas EK, Ghorabaee MK, Turskis Z (2017) An extension of the EDAS method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Stud Inform Control 26(1):5–12
Article
Google Scholar
Stanujkic D, Popovic G, Brzakovic M (2018) An approach to personnel selection in the IT industry based on the EDAS method. Transform Bus Econ 17(2):54–65
Statista Mobile POS Payments. https://www.statista.com/outlook/331/100/mobile-pospayments/worldwide#market-users. Accessed 14 Jan 2021
Stevic Z, Vasiljevic M, Zavadskas EK, Sremac S, Turskis Z (2018) Selection of carpenter manufacturer using fuzzy EDAS method. Inzinerine Ekonomika Eng Econ 29:281–290. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.3.16818
Article
Google Scholar
Tang CY, Lai CC, Law CW, Liew MC, Phua VV (2014) Examining key determinants of mobile wallet adoption intention in Malaysia: an empirical study using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 model. Int J Model Oper Manag 4(3–4):248–265
Google Scholar
Thakur R, Srivastava M (2014) Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Res 24(3):369–392
Article
Google Scholar
Turskis Z, Antuchevičienė J, Keršulienė V, Gaidukas G (2019) Hybrid group MCDM model to select the most effective alternative of the second runway of the airport. Symmetry 11(6):792
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Article
Google Scholar
Viswanathan V, Hollebeek LD, Malthouse EC, Maslowska E, Jung Kim S, Xie W (2017) The dynamics of consumer engagement with mobile technologies. Serv Sci 9(1):36–49
Article
Google Scholar
Wang C, Zhou X, Tu H, Tao S (2017) Some geometric aggregation operators based on picture fuzzy sets and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Ital J Pure Appl Math 37:477–492
Google Scholar
Wei GW (2016) Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems. J Bus Econ Manag 17:491–502. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1197147
Article
Google Scholar
Wei GW (2017a) Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:713–724. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161798
Article
Google Scholar
Wei GW (2017b) Some cosine similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications to strategic decision making. Informatica 28:547–564. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2017b.144
Wei GW (2018a) Some similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 15:77–89
Google Scholar
Wei GW (2018b) Picture fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Fund Inform 157:271–320. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2018-1628
Article
Google Scholar
Wei GW (2018c) TODIM method for picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Informatica 29:555–566. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2018c.181
Wei G, Gao H (2018) The generalized Dice similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Informatica 29(1):107–124
Article
Google Scholar
Wei GW, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:713–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0604-1
Article
Google Scholar
Xia X, Govindan K, Zhu Q (2015) Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J Clean Prod 87:811–825
Article
Google Scholar
Xu XG, Shi H, Xu DH, Liu HC (2019) Picture fuzzy Petri nets for knowledge representation and acquisition in considering conflicting opinions. Appl Sci 9(5):983
Article
Google Scholar
Yadav KM (2016) Behavioural intentions to adopt mobile wallets: a developing country’s perspective. J Indian Bus Res 8(3):227–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2015-0112
Article
Google Scholar
Yang YW, He YY (2019) Decision-making method based on picture fuzzy sets and its application in college scholarship evaluation. Decis Mak 2(9):48–57
Google Scholar
Yang S, Lu Y, Gupta S, Cao Y, Zhang R (2012) Mobile payment services adoption across time: an empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Comput Hum Behav 28(1):129–142
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang S, Wei G, Gao H, Wei C, Wei Y (2019) EDAS method for multiple criteria group decision making with picture fuzzy information and its application to green suppliers selections. Technol Econ Dev Econ 25(6):1123–1138
Article
Google Scholar
Žižović M, Pamučar D, Albijanić M, Chatterjee P, Pribićević I (2020) Eliminating rank reversal problem using a new multi-attribute model—the RAFSI method. Mathematics 8(6):1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061015
Article
Google Scholar