Skip to main content

General election effect on the network topology of Pakistan’s stock market: network-based study of a political event

Abstract

To examine the interdependency and evolution of Pakistan’s stock market, we consider the cross-correlation coefficients of daily stock returns belonging to the blue chip Karachi stock exchange (KSE-100) index. Using the minimum spanning tree network-based method, we extend the financial network literature by examining the topological properties of the network and generating six minimum spanning tree networks around three general elections in Pakistan. Our results reveal a star-like structure after the general elections of 2018 and before those in 2008, and a tree-like structure otherwise. We also highlight key nodes, the presence of different clusters, and compare the differences between the three elections. Additionally, the sectorial centrality measures reveal economic expansion in three industrial sectors—cement, oil and gas, and fertilizers. Moreover, a strong overall intermediary role of the fertilizer sector is observed. The results indicate a structural change in the stock market network due to general elections. Consequently, through this analysis, policy makers can focus on monitoring key nodes around general elections to estimate stock market stability, while local and international investors can form optimal diversification strategies.

Introduction

Political risk is a key factor affecting the performance of a country’s financial market. There are many ways political risk can take place, such as a change in legislation, general elections, or a political regime shift. According to (Pantzalis et al. 2000), positive stock returns are expected after the resolution of political uncertainty. Additionally, political events capture investor attention due to the possible revision of their investment strategies, depending on the outcome of the event (Pástor and Veronesi 2013). Previous research proposes various methods to study the impact of elections on stock markets [e.g., GARCH and Cumulative abnormal volatility (CAV) (Białkowski et al. 2008), Support vector regression (Chiu et al. 2012), Cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) and Abnormal returns AR (Oehler et al. 2013; Savita and Ramesh 2015), Regression analysis (Abidin et al. 2010; Liew and Rowland 2016) Granger cointegration and Johansen test (Goodell et al. 2015), and DCC bivariate GARCH (Sultonov and Jehan 2018)].

We extend the financial network literature by studying the impact of general elections on the network topology of Pakistan’s stock market. Network-based methods are widely applied by researchers to study interdependency and the evolution of stock markets, such as minimum spanning tree (MST) (Mantegna 1999; Onnela et al. 2003b; Zhao et al. 2018; Yao and Memon 2019), threshold networks (CT) (Boginski et al. 2005; Lee and Nobi 2018), planar maximally filtered graphs (PMFG) (Tumminello et al. 2005; Yan et al. 2015; Musmeci et al. 2016), wavelet (Wang et al. 2017), and multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) (Kou et al. 2014). We have chosen MST, a main network mapping methodology extensively used to analyze various financial crisis (Wiliński et al. 2013; Majapa and Gossel 2016; Coletti and Murgia 2016; Xia et al. 2018; Memon and Yao 2019; Kou et al. 2019), currency crisis (Jang et al. 2011; Sultornsanee et al. 2013), sovereign debt crisis events (Dias 2012), as well as macroeconomic phases (Zhang et al. 2011). Therefore, this paper examines the interdependency and evolution of Pakistan’s stock market by using MST before and after the general elections of 2018, 2013, and 2008.

In the summary, our study has made two contributions. First, we fill a research gap by examining the stock market’s structural change and topological evolution around a political event: general elections. Unlike previous studies, that apply network-based methods to examine crisis related events of stock markets (Onnela et al. 2003a; Yang et al. 2014; Radhakrishnan et al. 2016), assesses structural change of stock market around other political event (Yao and Memon 2019), and does not take into consideration structural change and topological evolution particularly across general elections. Second, we apply MST around the three general elections in an emerging stock market instead of a developed stock market. Thus, understanding the state and structures of stock market across general elections is important for local and institutional investors in forming diversified strategies and estimating stock market stability for policy makers.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the data, the MST methodology, and network topology centrality measures. In Section 3, we present and discuss the results. Finally, Section 4 presents our concluding remarks.

Data and methodology

Data

We use cross-correlations in the daily closing prices of 82 major stocks listed on the Pakistan stock exchange (PSX) for the blue chip companies’ index, which is also known as the Karachi stock exchange (KSE-100) index, before and after three general elections in Pakistan to determine MST maps. The division of the data around the three general elections is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 General elections dates and sub-sample division of the Pakistan stock market

To study the role of every stock and the topological evolution, we construct six MSTs for before and after the general elections, where each sub-sample comprises 40 trading days. Additionally, companies are divided based on their economic activities for sectorial analysis. All 82 companies (acting as nodes in the network), individual sectors, and color for identification in the MST network are presented in Table 2. The data are obtained from the websites of (OpendoorsPK 2018), and (BusinessRecorder 2018).

Table 2 The 82 stocks in the KSE-100 index. Company names are in chronological order

Methodology

Let Pi(t) be the closing price of stock i at time t, while logarithm return ri(t) of a stock is defined as:

$$ {r}_i(t)=\ln \left({P}_i(t)\right)-\ln \left({P}_i\left(t-1\right)\right). $$
(1)

We construct correlation matrix C = (cij) of size N × N among stocks i and j as follows:

$$ {C}_{ij}=\frac{\left\langle {r}_i\ {r}_j\right\rangle -\left\langle {r}_i\ \right\rangle \left\langle {r}_j\right\rangle }{\sqrt{\left(\left\langle {r}_i^2\right\rangle -{\left\langle {r}_i\right\rangle}^2\right)\ \left(\left\langle {r}_j^2\right\rangle -{\left\langle {r}_j\right\rangle}^2\right)}\ } $$
(2)

where ri and rj are the logarithm returns of stocks i and j, respectively, and 〈…〉 is the statistical average for the period under investigation. Following the methodology of (Mantegna 1999), the correlation matrix of (82 × 82) is transformed into a distance matrix among each pair of stocks i and j, being given by:

$$ {d}_{ij}=\sqrt{2\left(1-{C}_{ij}\right)}. $$
(3)

The MST is a backbone network of correlation tree that uses N − 1 linkages from N(N − 1)/2 cross-correlation coefficients by minimizing the sum of all edges. The 82 stocks on PSX are the nodes in the network joined by edges and characterized by weights W. We apply (Kruskal 1956) algorithm to an undirected graph (G) of form G = (N, E, W) into the MST.

To monitor the sectorial properties of Pakistan’s stock market network, we examine three centrality measures—degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality—in the periods before and after the general elections. The degree of centrality of stock i is given by:

$$ {C}_D(i)=\frac{\sum \limits_{j=1}^N{A}_{ij}}{N-1}, $$
(4)

where Aij is the component in the i-th row and j-th column of adjacency matrix A. The higher the value of CD(i) is, the more power stock i carries in influencing other stocks in the network (Marsden 2015).

Closeness centrality (Sabidussi 1966) is utilized to examine the amount of influence attached to an individual node in a network. This measure aims to examine the closeness of nodes with other nodes or sectors in the network and is defined as:

$$ \mathrm{Cc}\ (k)=\frac{1}{\sum_{h\in G}\ {d}_G\left(k,h\right)}, $$
(5)

where dG(k, h) represents the minimum distance between nodes k and h. Finally, to analyze the intermediary role of a node in the network, betweenness centrality is used to evaluate the frequency of a node acting as shortest link among two nodes and in transferring valuable information to the network:

$$ {C}_B(k)={\sum}_{s\ne k\ne t\epsilon V}\frac{\sigma_{st}(k)}{\sigma_{st}}, $$
(6)

where σst is the number of shortest paths between nodes s and t.

Results and discussion

Here, we present six MSTs of 82 stocks in KSE-100 of Pakistan stock market before and after three general elections (2018, 2013, and 2008). The stocks (nodes) are colored based on their business sectors, as per Table 2.

Figure 1 shows the MST map before the general election of 2018. There is no single most dominant stock, but four principal nodesFootnote 1: Nishat Mills (NML 6), D.G. Khan Cement (DGKC 5), Kohat Cement (KOHC 5), and Sui Northern Gas (SNGP 5). Therefore, MST highlights the strong dependency of Pakistan’s economy on cement, textile, and oil and gas sectors before the 2018 election. Additionally, the results show that the stocks in the cement (red) and oil and gas (yellow) sectors form clusters and connect with each other. However, companies in the commercial banks sector (blue) are split into two groups, one at the bottom left of the map and one on the middle-right side. Furthermore, a strong intermediary role is being played by SNGP, which is carrying the highest betweenness centrality score of 2265.

Fig. 1
figure1

MST map before the 2018 elections for the 82 stocks in KSE-100

The MST map after election 2018 of the KSE-100 index companies is presented in Fig. 2. We observe the scattered pattern of the commercial banking sector, where banks are linked to companies from other sectors. Similarly, oil and gas companies are separated from one major cluster before elections 2018 to a disbursed distribution after elections period. The split of these two sectors possibly reflect different responses to the risks constituted by general elections. In terms of connectivity, a main hub node is Lucky Cement (LUCK 10), followed by three key nodes: D.G. Khan Cement (DGKC 7), ENGRO Corporation (ENGRO 5), and Kohat Cement (KOHC 5). Several emerging countries such as South Africa (Majapa and Gossel 2016), Brazil (Tabak et al. 2010), China (Zhuang et al. 2008), and India (Sinha and Pan 2007) have key nodes in the MST, which is not uncommon on Pakistan’s stock market. In sum, the MST shows a star-like structure after the general elections of 2018, possibly reflecting a structural transition.

Fig. 2
figure2

MST map after the 2018 elections of 82 stocks in KSE-100

Figure 3 represents the 2013 pre-election MST map of the KSE-100 network. The figure shows a tree-like structure of the MST (Nobi et al. 2015) due to low value of centrality. The three key nodes of Mapple Leaf Cement (MLCF), Pak Suzuki Motors (PSMC), and Searle Company (SEARL) have a maximum of five connections each in the 2013 pre-election period. In addition, there is no major cluster formation and reduced connectivity in the network. Only three cement sector companies—DGKC, MLCF, and PIOC—connect with each other, the rest linking with companies from different sectors. Further, companies from almost all the sectors are scattered, and around 77% of nodes have two or fewer connections.

Fig. 3
figure3

MST map before the 2013 elections of the 82 stocks in KSE-100

The MST map of the KSE-100 index after the general elections of 2013 is presented in Fig. 4. We can observe a slight increase in the degree of connectivity per node for Maple Leaf Cement (MLCF 6), while four nodes—Cherat Packaging (CPPL), Hub Power (HUBC), Kohinoor Textile Mills (KTML), and Nishat Mills (NML)—have five connections each. Additionally, Searle (SEARL) and Pak Suzuki (PSMC) nodes have now two and one connection, respectively. This reconfiguration possibly represents the diversification of these companies after the general elections. The MST in post the 2013 election has a tree-like structure compared to the star-like structure in the post 2018 election period.

Fig. 4
figure4

MST map after the 2013 elections of the 82 stocks in KSE-100

The pre-2008 election MST map of the KSE-100 index companies is presented in Fig. 5. A major node is Pakistan Petroleum (PPL 9), followed by two significant nodes—Nishat Mills (NML 7) and Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB 5). Hence, PPL is the dominating company in the network before the 2008 general elections, and companies surrounding this node will be directly influenced by any shock due to the general elections (Sharif et al. 2016). Additionally, the oil and gas sector (yellow) and commercial banking sector (blue) cluster, whereas cement sector nodes (FCCL, MLCF, CHCC, PIOC, ACPL, LUCK) are spread over the entire network.

Fig. 5
figure5

MST map before the 2008 elections of the 82 stocks in KSE-100

Figure 6 shows the post 2008 election MST map of KSE-100 index network. We observe a tree-like structure and reduction in the degree of connections per node compared to the star-like structure before the election. D.G. Khan Cement (DGKC 7) is the most significant and central node, followed by Attock Refinery (ATRL 6) and Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDC 5). However, PPL has moved from nine connections before election to three. Additionally, companies from the cement sector form a cluster. Overall, the results show a structural change in the network topology from before to after the 2008 general elections.

Fig. 6
figure6

MST map after the 2008 election of the 82 stocks in KSE-100

Sectorial centrality measures

We here present the sectorial centrality properties of the KSE-100 index MST network for all three general elections. As centrality measures are important in network analysis to examine the behavior of networks (Ghanbari et al. 2018), we present the average sectorial degree of centrality in Fig. 7. The figure shows the cement sector nodes have a mean of approximately three incident edges, followed closely by oil and gas and fertilizer sectors with means of two and half. We can observe a large increase in the average number of incident edges for the nodes in the cement sector after the 2018 general elections compared to any other sectors. The other sector that exhibits an increase in connectivity is the paper and board sector after the 2013 elections. This increase in the number of edges highlights an expansion in the economic activities of these sectors in the elections periods. Additionally, the results show a consistent decrease in the connectivity of commercial banks in all the three post-election periods, compared to the high average degree of connections during the pre-elections periods. The comparison between pre- and post-elections centrality metrics shows a consistent average connectivity in the textile sector during all periods, except for a substantial increase in the post 2013 election period.

Fig. 7
figure7

Average degree centrality for the KSE-100 sector network. Sectors with less than two companies are excluded

Figure 8 presents the average sectorial closeness centrality for the periods before and after the elections. The cement sector has a large average closeness centrality of 0.26 after the 2018 election, followed by the oil and gas (0.22), pharmaceutical (0.22), technology and communications (0.21), and paper and board 0.21 sectors over the same period. This could be interpreted as the key role of these sectors in the MST after the 2018 election. Additionally, the cement sector is closer to other sectors’ nodes as the companies from this sector have the highest average closeness centrality. By contrast, the lowest average closeness centrality is registered by the paper and board sector (0.090 after the 2008 general elections. However, the overall average closeness centrality is 0.15 for all sectors during all periods.

Fig. 8
figure8

Average closeness centrality for the KSE-100 sector network. Sectors with less than two companies are excluded

Regarding average sectorial betweenness centrality, Fig. 9 shows that the fertilizer sector has the maximum number of shortest routes and has a strong mediating role, especially before the 2013 elections. Additionally, the average betweenness centralities of the oil and gas and cement sectors are also high. Similarly, an increase in the mediation effect of the cement sector is also registered after the 2018 election. Furthermore, the food and personal care products, tobacco, pharmacy, and automobile sectors present the lowest overall average betweenness centrality scores, reflecting their weak mediation effects.

Fig. 9
figure9

Average betweenness centrality for the KSE-100 sector network. Sectors with less than two companies are excluded

Conclusions

We presented the topology of the network formed by the 82 main stocks on the Pakistan stock market using MST for the three general elections in 2018, 2013, and 2008. We observed the status of and changes in the MST network as a result of these political events. The MST had no dominant node, but had two major clusters for the cement and oil and gas sectors and a tree-like structure before the general elections of 2018, compared to a star-like structure and a major node (LUCK) and broken clusters after the 2018 elections. Comparatively, for the 2013 elections, we found a decrease in the connectivity and scattered sectors before the elections and an improvement in connectivity due to diversification after the elections. A star-like structure of the MST is observed before the 2008 elections, with the dominating node being PPL compared to a significant drop in connections and in PPL’s influence along with a tree-like structure after the 2008 general elections. In addition to the six MST maps, we also assessed our results by using degree centrality, sectorial closeness, and betweenness centrality. The average sectorial degree of centrality measure shows the economic expansion and highest number of incident edges for the cement sector nodes, followed by the oil and gas and fertilizer sectors. Similarly, the sectorial closeness and betweenness centrality measures revealed the importance of the cement sector nodes and strong overall intermediary role of the fertilizer sector.

Studying stock market topology around general elections has significant implications for local and international investors for portfolio management, such as forming optimal diversification strategies. Additionally, identification of core nodes and sectors, systematic and political risk assessment is useful for policy makers or regulators in assuring stock market stability. Our study examines stock market structural change and topological evolution around general elections through MST technique. Perhaps, we could compare networks formed through alternative methods of PMFG (Tumminello et al. 2005), and asset graphs (Onnela et al. 2003b, c). In addition, we can analyze the impact of various political and macroeconomic events on rolling windows of different sizes in a temporary dynamic stock market network. Further, we can apply MST method to analyze structural change and dynamics around political event of general elections into other stock markets (e.g., developed markets or other emerging markets). The future research may address these limitations.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on http://www.opendoors.pk/ and https://markets.brecorder.com/.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The number against each stock symbol specifies the number of connections per node.

Abbreviations

AR:

Abnormal returns

CAAR:

Cumulative average abnormal returns

KSE:

Karachi Stock Exchange

MST:

Minimum Spanning Tree

PMFG:

Planar maximally filtered graph

PSX:

Pakistan Stock Exchange

References

  1. Abidin SZ, Old C, Martin T (2010) Effects of New Zealand general elections on stock market returns. Int Rev Bus Res Papers 6:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Białkowski J, Gottschalk K, Wisniewski TP (2008) Stock market volatility around national elections. J Bank Financ 32:1941–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boginski V, Butenko S, Pardalos PM (2005) Statistical analysis of financial networks. Comput Stat Data Anal 48:431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BusinessRecorder (2018). Available: https://markets.brecorder.com/ [Accessed 06 Jan 2019]

  5. Chiu D, Ying M, Yu P (2012) A study of Taiwan political elections and stock market dynamism. 2012 Sixth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, 25–28 Aug 2012. 562–565

  6. Coletti P, Murgia M (2016) The network of the Italian stock market during the 2008–2011 financial crises. Algorithmic Finance 5:111–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dias J (2012) Sovereign debt crisis in the European Union: a minimum spanning tree approach. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 391:2046–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghanbari R, Jalili M, Yu X (2018) Correlation of cascade failures and centrality measures in complex networks. Futur Gener Comput Syst 83:390–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodell JW, Mcgroarty F, Urquhart A (2015) Political uncertainty and the 2012 US presidential election: A cointegration study of prediction markets, polls and a stand-out expert. Int Rev Financ Anal 42:162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang W, Lee J, Chang W (2011) Currency crises and the evolution of foreign exchange market: evidence from minimum spanning tree. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 390:707–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kou G, Chao X, Peng Y, Alsaadi FE, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Machine learning methods for systemic risk analysis in financial sectors. Technol Econ Dev Econ 25:716–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kou G, Peng Y, Wang G (2014) Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods. Inf Sci 275:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruskal JB (1956) On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proc Am Math Soc 7(1):48–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JW, Nobi A (2018) State and network structures of stock markets around the global financial crisis. Comput Econ 51:195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liew VK-S, Rowland R (2016) The effect of Malaysia general election on stock market returns. SpringerPlus 5:1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Majapa M, Gossel SJ (2016) Topology of the south African stock market network across the 2008 financial crisis. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 445:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantegna RN (1999) Hierarchical structure in financial markets. Eur Phys J B 11(1):193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsden PV (2015) Network centrality, measures of. In: Wright JD (ed) International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (second edition). Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Memon BA, Yao H (2019) Structural change and dynamics of Pakistan stock market during crisis: A complex network perspective. Entropy 21:248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Musmeci N, Aste T, di Matteo T (2016) Interplay between past market correlation structure changes and future volatility outbursts. Sci Rep 6:36320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nobi A, Maeng SE, Ha GG, Lee JW (2015) Structural changes in the minimal spanning tree and the hierarchical network in the Korean stock market around the global financial crisis. J Korean Phys Soc 66:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oehler A, Walker TJ, Wendt S (2013) Effects of election results on stock price performance: evidence from 1980 to 2008. Manag Financ 39:714–736

    Google Scholar 

  23. Onnela JP, Chakraborti A, Kaski K, Kertész J (2003a) Dynamic asset trees and black Monday. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 324:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Onnela JP, Chakraborti A, Kaski K, Kertész J, Kanto A (2003b) Dynamics of market correlations: taxonomy and portfolio analysis. Phys Rev E 68:056110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Onnela JP, Chakraborti A, Kaski K, Kertsz J, Kanto A (2003c) Asset trees and asset graphs in financial markets. Phys Scr T106:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. OpendoorsPK (2018) Available: http://www.opendoors.pk/ [Accessed 04 Jan 2019]

  27. Pantzalis C, Stangeland DA, Turtle HJ (2000) Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: the international evidence. J Bank Financ 24:1575–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pástor Ľ, Veronesi P (2013) Political uncertainty and risk premia. J Financ Econ 110:520–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Radhakrishnan S, Duvvuru A, Sultornsanee S, Kamarthi S (2016) Phase synchronization based minimum spanning trees for analysis of financial time series with nonlinear correlations. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 444:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sabidussi G (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31:581–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Savita, Ramesh A (2015) Return volatility around National Elections: evidence from India. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 189:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharif S, Ismail S, Zurni O, Theng LH (2016) Validation of global financial crisis on Bursa Malaysia stocks market companies via covariance structure. Am J Appl Sci 13:1091–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sinha S, Pan RK (2007) Uncovering the internal structure of the Indian financial market: large cross-correlation behavior in the NSE. In: Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti BK (eds) Econophysics of markets and business networks: proceedings of the Econophys-Kolkata III. Springer Milan, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sultonov M, Jehan SN (2018) Dynamic linkages between Japan’s foreign exchange and stock markets: response to the Brexit referendum and the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. J Risk Financ Manage 11:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sultornsanee S, Duvvuru A, Radhakrishnan S, Chowdhary H, Kamarthi S (2013) Phase synchronization based minimum spanning trees for the analysis and visualization of currency exchange markets. Proc Comput Sci 20:460–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabak BM, Serra TR, Cajueiro DO (2010) Topological properties of stock market networks: the case of Brazil. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 389:3240–3249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tumminello M, Aste T, di Matteo T, Mantegna RN (2005) A tool for filtering information in complex systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:10421–10426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang G-J, Xie C, Chen S (2017) Multiscale correlation networks analysis of the US stock market: a wavelet analysis. J Econ Interac Coord 12:561–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiliński M, Sienkiewicz A, Gubiec T, Kutner R, Struzik ZR (2013) Structural and topological phase transitions on the German stock exchange. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 392:5963–5973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xia L, You D, Jiang X, Guo Q (2018) Comparison between global financial crisis and local stock disaster on top of Chinese stock network. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 490:222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan X-G, Xie C, Wang G-J (2015) Stock market network’s topological stability: evidence from planar maximally filtered graph and minimal spanning tree. Int J Modern Phys B 29:1550161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang R, Li X, Zhang T (2014) Analysis of linkage effects among industry sectors in China’s stock market before and after the financial crisis. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 411:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao H, Memon BA (2019) Network topology of FTSE 100 index companies: from the perspective of Brexit. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 523:1248–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang Y, Lee GHT, Wong JC, Kok JL, Prusty M, Cheong SA (2011) Will the US economy recover in 2010? A minimal spanning tree study. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 390:2020–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao L, Wang G-J, Wang M, Bao W, Li W, Stanley HE (2018) Stock market as temporal network. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 506:1104–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhuang R, Hu B, Ye Z (2008) Minimal spanning tree for Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 stock index. 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), 1–6 June 2008. 1417–1424

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and anonymous referees for their insightful suggestions. We also thank the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics for providing open access to our article.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BAM (First & Corresponding Author) carried out the idea, designed the research, analyzed and interpreted data, applied methodology and visualization, discussed the results and wrote the article. HY (second author) supervised the research, provided necessary resources, and reviewed the article. RT (third author) helped in data collection, and revising the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Ahmed Memon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Memon, B.A., Yao, H. & Tahir, R. General election effect on the network topology of Pakistan’s stock market: network-based study of a political event. Financ Innov 6, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0165-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Minimum spanning tree
  • Centrality measures
  • General elections
  • Emerging market
  • Pakistan
  • Stock market network