Skip to main content

Table 17 Song test results for the risk measure \(R_t^{s}\) computed on Apple real data, fixing \(M=80\%\) and considering \(M'=30\%\), \(M'=40\%\), \(M'=50\%\). \(Z_0\) is the statistic test value under the null hypothesis

From: Drawdown-based risk indicators for high-frequency financial volumes

\(R_t^{s}\) - APPLE

\(M=80\%-M'=30\%\)

\(\alpha =0.10\)

\(\alpha =0.05\)

\(\alpha =0.01\)

\(Z_0\)

\(s=3\) vs \(s=5\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.5914

\(s=3\) vs \(s=50\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.6174

\(s=3\) vs \(s=100\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.9189

\(M=80\%-M'=40\%\)

\(\alpha =0.10\)

\(\alpha =0.05\)

\(\alpha =0.01\)

\(Z_0\)

\(s=3\) vs \(s=5\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.5217

\(s=3\) vs \(s=50\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.6957

\(s=3\) vs \(s=100\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.4733

\(M=80\%-M'=50\%\)

\(\alpha =0.10\)

\(\alpha =0.05\)

\(\alpha =0.01\)

\(Z_0\)

\(s=3\) vs \(s=5\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.2731

\(s=3\) vs \(s=50\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.3765

\(s=3\) vs \(s=100\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

Reject \(H_{0}\)

3.1379