Skip to main content

Table 4 Experts’ linguistic evaluation of alternatives to the criteria

From: A fuzzy BWM and MARCOS integrated framework with Heronian function for evaluating cryptocurrency exchanges: a case study of Türkiye

 

A1

A2

A3

A4

A5

C1

VG, VG, EG, G, EG, VG

MG, VG, G, M, MG, M

VG, VG, EG, G, EG, VG

M, MG, MG, MP, M, M

M, MG, M, MP, M, MP

C2

EG, EG, EG, VG, EG, VG

MG, EG, EG, MP, MP, M

EG, EG, EG, M, EG, VG

MP, M, MG, MP, MP, M

MP, M, M, MP, P, MP

C3

MP, VG, M, MG, G, MG

G, MG, EG, G, VG, G

VG, VG, G, G, VG, VG

G, MG, M, MG, G, G

MG, MG, M, M, G, G

C4

VG, EG, VG, G, VG, EG,

MG, G, MG, MP, MP, MP

P, M, MP, VP, VP, VP

MP, MG, MP, P, P, VP

MP, MG, G, MP, P, VP

C5

EG, EG, EG, VG, EG, EG

P, MP, M, M, P, P

G, G, G, MG, MG, G

MP, MP, MP, P, VP, P

VP, P, P, VP, EP, VP

C6

EG, EG, EG, VG, EG, VG

MP, M, M, MP, M, P

EG, VG, EG, G, EG, EG

MP, MP, MG, MP, MP, P

MP, P, P, VP, P, VP

C7

EG, EG, EG, VG, G, G

MP, MP, M, P, M, MP

G, VG, G, EG, VG, VG

MP, P, MP, P, P, MP

MP, P, P, P, VP, VP

  1. EP extremely poor, VP very poor, P poor, MP medium poor, M medium, MG medium good, G good, VG very good, EG extremely good