Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

From: Determinants of conventional and digital investment advisory decisions: a systematic literature review

Criterium

Included

Excluded

Language of publication

English

All other languages than English

Research question studied

All factors that could possibly influence investment advice; determinants that are necessary to give suitable advice to the clients; comparison of conventional and digital advice giving

All publications that consider only the perspective of investors, e.g. investors who are biased; publications that consider country specific regulations and general laws

Type of publication

Articles, studies and reviews that are peer-reviewed (exception if not peer-reviewed: frequently cited, appropriate data and methodology)

Publications that have not yet been peer-reviewed; articles that lack relevant content and methodology

Data description

Only publications with a clear description of the used data

All publications that lack a clear data description

Methodology description

Only publications with a clear description of the applied methodology

All publications that lack a clear methodology description

Reported outcomes

Only publications with clearly reported outcomes

All publications that lack a clear outcome description

Publication date

All publications available

–

Study population

No limitation, but representative

Studies with not representative samples

Geographic location of the study

Studies that consider one or more of the countries of the world (no limitation to one country)

–