Skip to main content
Financial Innovation

Table 10 Descriptive statistics of Copeland rankings in weight simulation

From: Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation

Alternatives

Expert Ranks

Weight simulation descriptive statistics

Mean

Min

Max

Median

St. Dev

Skewness

Kurtosis

A1

13

13.1989

3

21

14

3.0031

− 0.5141

2.3531

A2

9

8.3358

2

15

9

2.5965

− 0.574

2.8505

A3

11

10.782

2

19

11

2.9509

− 0.3458

2.593

A4

6

8.0252

1

14

8

2.4312

− 0.5111

2.7584

A5

14

14.6107

9

21

15

1.816

0.0222

2.467

A6

15

13.9239

8

21

14

1.881

− 0.1819

3.2407

A7

4

4.6802

1

12

5

2.583

0.2081

2.1873

A8

2

2.9787

1

11

2

1.7009

1.0858

3.7498

A9

5

4.0924

1

13

4

2.2828

0.7547

3.1099

A10

19

19.5869

13

22

20

1.5237

− 0.3601

2.7243

A11

20

16.5212

3

22

18

4.4872

− 0.8195

2.6763

A12

12

11.7392

3

21

12

3.0177

0.0021

2.7479

A13

3

4.5833

1

12

4

1.5782

0.4097

2.8058

A14

7

12.1886

1

21

13

4.7844

− 0.4366

2.0962

A15

18

18.5811

12

22

19

2.1348

− 0.4342

2.8266

A16

1

1.9978

1

10

1

1.5063

1.7036

5.964

A17

17

16.3876

7

22

17

2.4736

− 0.5452

2.5748

A18

8

6.9177

2

15

7

2.3545

0.0581

2.7473

A19

10

7.861

2

16

8

2.8782

− 0.2456

2.212

A20

21

18.5334

7

22

19

2.5968

− 1.5987

5.5298

A21

22

21.6407

17

22

22

0.7897

− 2.5449

9.7174

A22

16

15.8338

3

22

17

4.3311

− 0.8297

2.8308

Back to article page