Fig. 3From: Effects of ambiguity on innovation strategiesProbabilities of the four strategies under ambiguity when the profitability of the future innovation, \(\mu\), varies. \(PC\), \(PB\), \(PL\), and \(PG\) represent the probabilities of pursuing compulsive, buy-and-hold, leapfrog, and laggard strategies, respectively. Parameter \(c\) represents the degree of ambiguity perceived by managers. When \(c=0.5\), ambiguity is absent, implying that managers are neutral toward ambiguity. The upper left figure illustrates Fig. 2 in Grenadier and Weiss (1997). As \(c\) decreases, the degree of ambiguity increases. Here, \(c=0.2\) represents the highest degree of ambiguity perceived by managers. As the profitability of future innovation increases, \(PC\) and \(PL\) increase, whereas \(PB\) and \(PG\) decreaseBack to article page