Table 2 Linguistic scales and golden cut-based quantum spherical fuzzy numbers
For criteria | For alternatives | Possibility degrees | Quantum spherical fuzzy numbers |
|---|---|---|---|
No (n) | Worst (w) | 0.40 | \(\left[\sqrt{0.16}{e}^{j2\pi .0.4},\sqrt{0.10}{e}^{j2\pi .0.25},\sqrt{0.74}{e}^{j2\pi .0.35}\right]\) |
Some (s) | Bad (p) | 0.45 | \(\left[\sqrt{0.20}{e}^{j2\pi .0.45},\sqrt{0.13}{e}^{j2\pi .0.28},\sqrt{0.67}{e}^{j2\pi .0.27}\right]\) |
Medium (m) | Normal (f) | 0.50 | \(\left[\sqrt{0.25}{e}^{j2\pi .0.50},\sqrt{0.15}{e}^{j2\pi .0.31},\sqrt{0.60}{e}^{j2\pi .0.19}\right]\) |
High (h) | Effective (g) | 0.55 | \(\left[\sqrt{0.30}{e}^{j2\pi .0.55},\sqrt{0.19}{e}^{j2\pi .0.34},\sqrt{0.51}{e}^{j2\pi .0.11}\right]\) |
Very high (vh) | Perfect (b) | 0.60 | \(\left[\sqrt{0.36}{e}^{j2\pi .0.6},\sqrt{0.22}{e}^{j2\pi .0.37},\sqrt{0.42}{e}^{j2\pi .0.03}\right]\) |