Dimension | Criteria | (▲denotes selected; △ denotes not selected) | References | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preliminary Questionnaire from literature review | Finalized questionnaire derived from FKM + DRSA | |||||
Code | Result | Code | Result | |||
(A) AI application strategy | AI competencies | c1 | ▲ | a1 | ▲ | Atmaca and Karadaş (2020), Gil et al. (2020), Jarrahi (2018), McCollum (2017), Pelletier (2017), Rodríguez et al. (2016), Schotten and Morais (2019), Tredinnick (2017) |
AI risks and opportunities | c2 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
AI outcomes and expected level | c3 | ▲ | a2 | ▲ | ||
The ability of AI provider | c4 | ▲ | a3 | ▲ | ||
AI cognition of senior executives | c5 | ▲ | a4 | ▲ | ||
(B) AI governance | The techniques of AI governance | c6 | ▲ | b1 | ▲ | Hesami and Jones (2020), Negnevitsky (2005), Pelletier (2017), Bizarro and Dorian (2017), Länsiluoto et al. (2016), Schmitt (2022) |
AI activities and decisions | c7 | ▲ | b2 | ▲ | ||
AI policies and procedures | c8 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
AI accountability and oversight | c9 | ▲ | b3 | ▲ | ||
AI monitor | c10 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
The necessary skills and expertise of AI responsibilities | c11 | ▲ | b4 | ▲ | ||
(C) Data infrastructure and data quality | Data accessibility | c12 | ▲ | c1 | ▲ | Hirsch (2018), Kou et al. (2021a, b), Pelletier (2017), Tredinnick (2017), Vial et al. 2021 |
Information privacy and security | c13 | ▲ | c2 | ▲ | ||
Roles and responsibilities for data ownership and use | c14 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
The completeness, accuracy, and reliability of the data | c15 | ▲ | c3 | ▲ | ||
Data reconciliation, synthesis, and validation | c16 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
Cyber resilience | c17 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
(D) Human factor | AI design | c18 | ▲ | – | △ | Dignum et al. (2004), IIA (2017a), Scherer (2016), Srinivasan and González 2022 |
AI test | c19 | ▲ | d1 | ▲ | ||
AI technologies | c20 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
AI output | c21 | ▲ | – | △ | ||
Human error and biases | c22 | ▲ | d2 | ▲ | ||
Black box elements | c23 | ▲ | d3 | ▲ |