Table 9 The results of solving the proposed game for both scenarios with 2 suppliers and 3 products
SC status | Centralized | WTCF | TCFRS contract (Sc-1) | Profitability ratio (TCFRS, WTCF) | TCF contract (Sc-2) | Profitability ratio (TCFSc-2, WTCF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC profit | 15,603,459 | 11,606,136 | 15,565,936 | 34.12% | 14,469,205 | 24.67% |
Manufacturer’s profit | – | 10,149,412 | 12,528,817 | 23.44% | 11,796,849 | 16.23% |
Sum of suppliers’ profit | – | 1,456,724 | 3,037,119 | 108.49% | 2,672,356 | 83.45% |
Sup1 profit | – | 866,892 | 1,864,633 | 115.09% | 1,658,247 | 91.29% |
Sup2 profit | - | 589,832 | 1,172,486 | 98.78% | 1,014,109 | 71.93% |
\(\varphi\) | – | – | 51% | – | – | – |
Production quantities | 5009 | 2605 | 5010 | 92.32% | 4991 | 91.59% |
6513 | 4519 | 6518 | 44.25% | 6487 | 43.55% | |
6811 | 3930 | 6814 | 73.38% | 6789 | 72.75% | |
Loan amount | – | 1,500,000 | 301,692 | – | 410,576 | – |
Runtime | – | – | 4708 | – | 5165 | – |