Table 23 Results of full pairwise comparison (BF, BF + CNAP, BF + CNLD, BF + DNAP, BF + DNLD, BF + SNAP, and BF + SNLD)
From: Clues from networks: quantifying relational risk for credit risk evaluation of SMEs
Average rank | p-value of pairwise comparison | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BF | BF + CNAP | BF + CNLD | BF + DNAP | BF + DNLD | BF + SNAP | ||
BF | 5.07 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
BF + CNAP | 4.40 | < 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – |
BF + CNLD | 3.76 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | – | – | – | – |
BF + DNAP | 3.60 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | – | – | – |
BF + DNLD | 3.28 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.037 | – | – |
BF + SNAP | 4.24 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | – |
BF + SNLD | 3.65 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 1.000 | < 0.001 | 0.005 | < 0.001 |
Friedman χ2 | 433.640 (< 0.001) | ||||||