Skip to main content

Table 3 Testing results of the momentum of jumps

From: To jump or not to jump: momentum of jumps in crude oil price volatility prediction

Look-back period

h = 1

h = 5

h = 10

h = 22

k = 1

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

k = 5

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

k = 10

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

k = 22

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

  1. This table provides the p values of the Pesaran and Timmermann (2009) chi-square statistic that is used to test the existence of the momentum of jumps (MoJ). The MoJ refers to that the forecasting model with jump information (i.e., the HAR-CJ) which outperforms the benchmark model without jump information (i.e., the HAR-RV) over a recent past period is able to show better forecasting performance in the near future. Statistically, the future forecasting performance of the HAR-CJ relative to the HAR-RV for time \(t + 1:t + h\) is defined as
  2. \(fp_{t + 1:t + h} = I\left( {(RV_{t + 1:t + h} - \widehat{RV}_{t + 1:t + h}^{CJ} )^{2} - (RV_{t + 1:t + h} - \widehat{RV}_{t + 1:t + h}^{RV} )^{2} < 0} \right),\)
  3. where \(I( \cdot )\) refers to an indicator function, \(\widehat{RV}_{i + 1:i + h}^{CJ}\) and \(\widehat{RV}_{i + 1:i + h}^{RV}\) are the HAR-CJ and HAR-RV forecasts, respectively, for \(RV_{i + 1:i + h}\). Similarly, the past forecasting performance of the HAR-CJ relative to the HAR-RV for time \(t + 1:t + h\) is defined as
  4. \(pp_{t + 1:t + h} (k) = I\left( {\sum\limits_{i = t - h - k + 1}^{t - h} {(RV_{i + 1:i + h} - \widehat{RV}_{i + 1:i + h}^{CJ} )^{2} } - \sum\limits_{i = t - h - k + 1}^{t - h} {(RV_{i + 1:i + h} - \widehat{RV}_{i + 1:i + h}^{RV} )^{2} } < 0} \right),\)
  5. where k refers to the length of the look-back period. In a statistical sense, the cross-sectional dependence between \(pp_{t + 1:t + h} (k)\) and \(fp_{t + 1:t + h}\) equates with the existence of MoJ. The chi-square statistic of Pesaran and Timmermann (2009) is used to test the null hypothesis that \(pp_{t + 1:t + h} (k)\) and \(fp_{t + 1:t + h}\) are not cross-sectional dependent in the presence of serial dependencies for each series itself against the alternative hypothesis that the two time series are cross-sectional dependent. The corresponding p values are reported.