Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation matrix.

From: Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India

 

REP

CFP

CSG

CGEN

CAGE

CEDU

CDUA

CREM

CTEN

CNAT

CBUS

LEV

FS

TAN

PROD

VIF

REP

1

               

CFP

\({0.110}^{*}\)

1

              

CSG

− 0.010

\({0.370}^{*}\)

1

             

CGEN

− 0.007

\({0.084}^{*}\)

− 0.007

1

           

1.082

CAGE

\({-0.237}^{*}\)

\({-0.099}^{*}\)

\({-0.096}^{*}\)

0.005

1

          

1.159

CEDU

\({0.106}^{*}\)

\({0.088}^{*}\)

0.031

0.054

\({-0.130}^{*}\)

1

         

1.162

CDUA

0.007

\({-0.166}^{*}\)

− 0.045

− 0.048

\({0.263}^{*}\)

− 0.007

1

        

1.229

CREM

\({0.188}^{*}\)

\({0.215}^{*}\)

0.055

\({-0.168}^{*}\)

− 0.024

\({0.204}^{*}\)

\({-0.134}^{*}\)

1

       

1.169

CTEN

\({0.124}^{*}\)

− 0.026

\({0.058}^{**}\)

0.032

\({0.217}^{*}\)

\({-0.174}^{*}\)

\({0.160}^{*}\)

\({0.072}^{*}\)

1

      

1.301

CNAT

− 0.121

− 0.054

− 0.030

\({0.069}^{**}\)

0.026

\({-0.060}^{**}\)

\({-0.107}^{*}\)

− 0.009

\({-0.088}^{*}\)

1

     

1.068

CBUS

\({-0.021}^{*}\)

\({-0.220}^{*}\)

− 0.007

\({0.086}^{*}\)

\({0.153}^{*}\)

0.020

\({0.153}^{*}\)

0.009

\({0.180}^{*}\)

− 0.032

1

    

1.150

LEV

− 0.026

\({-0.112}^{*}\)

0.006

− 0.007

0.012

0.038

0.030

− 0.029

\({0.072}^{*}\)

− 0.006

0.041

1

   

1.020

FS

\({0.248}^{*}\)

\({0.202}^{*}\)

\({0.079}^{*}\)

\({-0.114}^{*}\)

\({0.094}^{*}\)

\({0.217}^{*}\)

\({0.192}^{*}\)

\({0.112}^{*}\)

\({-0.264}^{*}\)

\({0.106}^{*}\)

\({0.185}^{*}\)

0.031

1

  

1.493

TAN

− 0.022

\({-0.227}^{*}\)

\({-0.096}^{*}\)

0.022

\({0.080}^{*}\)

− 0.024

− 0.001

− 0.042

− 0.018

\({0.117}^{*}\)

\({0.168}^{*}\)

\({-0.063}^{**}\)

\({0.244}^{*}\)

1

 

1.220

PROD

\({0.110}^{*}\)

\({0.343}^{*}\)

\({0.082}^{*}\)

0.048

− 0.028

− 0.010

\({-0.161}^{*}\)

\({0.092}^{*}\)

0.010

0.035

− 0.054

0.004

\({-0.301}^{*}\)

\({-0.330}^{*}\)

1

1.249

  1. This table reports the Pearson correlation among variables used in the present study. The definition and measurement of all the variables are provided in Table 2. * and ** indicate statistical significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively