Skip to main content

Table 8 Regression result of FinTech access and financial literacy.

From: How does financial literacy impact on inclusive finance?

FinTech account (DV)

Logit model

Probit model

A

B

A

B

Profession

 

 − 0.348

 

 − 0.113

  

(0.316)

 

(0.170)

Income

 

0.490***

 

0.275**

  

(0.188)

 

(0.107)

Education

 

0.779***

 

0.344**

  

(0.272)

 

(0.143)

Send & withdraw ability

5.089

5.312***

2.752

2.782***

 

(0.490)

(0.502)

(0.209)

(0.206)

Billpay ability

 − 0.69

 − 0.750

 − 0.268

 − 0.323

 

(0.802)

(0.859)

(0.409)

(0.431)

Software use ability

1.396

1.811***

0.839

1.045***

 

(0.435)

(0.491)

(0.247)

(0.271)

Online dealing ability

1.546

2.378***

0.802

1.187**

 

(0.792)

(0.887)

(0.442)

(0.477)

FinTech training

1.526

1.647***

0.869

0.903***

 

(0.563)

(0.590)

(0.318)

(0.320)

_cons

 − 1.56

 − 0.440

 − 0.957

 − 0.574

 

(0.155)

(0.622)

(0.086)

(0.346)

  1. This model presents the association between financial literacy and FinTech access. Part A of the logit model shows − 182.95 log-likelihood, LR chi2 (5) is 679.05, and model fits at 65% Pseudo R2 value; where part B shows − 173.75 log-likelihood, LR chi2 (8) is 697.46, and model fits at 67% Pseudo R2 value. On the other hand, Part A of the Probit model shows − 181.77 log-likelihood, LR chi2 (5) is 681.4, and the model fits at 65% Pseudo R2 value; where part B shows − 176.63 log-likelihood, LR chi2 (8) is 695.7, and model fits at 67% Pseudo R2 value. The value of Prob > chi2 is 0.000 for all models, and the observation of A & B is 852. ***, **, *refer significance level at 99%, 95%, 90%, respectively. The value within the first bracket is the standard error value