Skip to main content

Table 10 Evaluation scales for the criteria and alternatives.

From: Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach

Alternative evaluations

Criterion evaluations

Interval type 2 fuzzy numbers

Very poor (VP)

Very low (VL)

((0, 0, 0, 0.1; 1, 1), (0, 0, 0, 0.05; 0.9, 0.9))

Poor (P)

Low (L)

((0, 0.1, 0.1, 0.3; 1, 1), (0.05, 0.1, 0.1, 0.2; 0.9, 0.9))

Medium poor (MP)

Medium low (ML)

((0.1, 0.3, 0.3, 0.5; 1, 1), (0.2, 0.3, 0.3, 0.4; 0.9, 0.9))

Fair (F)

Medium (M)

((0.3, 0.5, 0.5, 0.7; 1, 1), (0.4, 0.5, 0.5, 0.6; 0.9, 0.9))

Good (G)

Medium high (MH)

((0.5, 0.7, 0.7, 0.9; 1, 1), (0.6, 0.7, 0.7, 0.8; 0.9, 0.9))

Very good (VG)

High (H)

((0.7, 0.9, 0.9, 1; 1, 1), (0.8, 0.9, 0.9, 0.95; 0.9, 0.9))

Best (B)

Very high (VH)

((0.9, 1, 1, 1; 1, 1), (0.95, 1, 1, 1; 0.9, 0.9))