Table 11 Adjusted p-values for the Friedman aligned post-hoc test with Bergmann and Hommel’s correction for multiple comparisons among the four algorithms
From: Portfolio optimization by improved NSGA-II and SPEA 2 based on different risk measures
Hypothesis | Adj. p-values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Δ ∗ | IGD | HV | |
NSGA-IIb versus NSGA-IIa | 6.276e−05 | 6.889e−05 | 9.857e−06 |
NSGA-IIb versus SPEA 2b | 1 | 1 | 1 |
NSGA-IIb versus SPEA 2a | 3.098e−05 | 1.692e−05 | 8.199e−06 |
NSGA-IIa versus SPEA 2a | 1 | 1 | 1 |
SPEA 2b versus SPEA 2a | 3.098e−05 | 1.692e−05 | 8.199e−06 |