Skip to main content

Table 5 Day-of-the-week effect and mood, subperiod analysis

From: Day-of-the-week returns and mood: an exterior template approach

 

VW

EW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Panel A: 1953-1970

 λ0

-0.5841

-0.7243

-0.8092

-0.8558

-0.8237

-0.8748

-0.7486

-0.6979

-0.6549

-0.6031

-0.5723

-0.5646

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0670

0.0684

0.0842

0.0760

0.0767

0.0749

0.0772

0.0740

0.0716

0.0661

0.0648

0.0689

 t-statistic

-8.71

-10.59

-9.61

-11.26

-10.74

-11.69

-9.70

-9.43

-9.14

-9.12

-8.83

-8.20

p-value

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

 λ1

0.0942

0.1168

0.1305

0.1381

0.1329

0.1411

0.1208

0.1126

0.1056

0.0973

0.0923

0.0911

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0101

0.0103

0.0130

0.0115

0.0117

0.0114

0.0117

0.0112

0.0108

0.0100

0.0098

0.0104

 t-statistic

9.30

11.33

10.08

11.97

11.37

12.43

10.29

10.07

9.74

9.77

9.44

8.74

p-value

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

 R2

0.0152

0.0221

0.0195

0.0251

0.0229

0.0270

0.0188

0.0177

0.0171

0.0161

0.0156

0.0134

 Adjusted R2

0.0150

0.0218

0.0192

0.0249

0.0227

0.0267

0.0186

0.0175

0.0169

0.0159

0.0153

0.0132

 Proportion of effect explained by mood

53.5%

64.1%

71.1%

72.7%

66.7%

74.1%

59.0%

56.6%

56.7%

53.4%

54.5%

51.9%

Panel B: 1971-1988

 λ0

-0.4275

-0.8908

-1.0030

-1.0830

-1.0637

-1.0445

-1.0528

-0.9969

-0.8936

-0.7974

-0.7125

-0.3291

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0946

0.0749

0.0678

0.0716

0.0764

0.0814

0.0813

0.0851

0.0871

0.0873

0.0895

0.0987

 t-statistic

-4.52

-11.89

-14.79

-15.13

-13.92

-12.84

-12.95

-11.71

-10.26

-9.13

-7.96

-3.33

p-value

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

 λ1

0.0689

0.1436

0.1617

0.1746

0.1715

0.1684

0.1697

0.1607

0.1441

0.1286

0.1149

0.0531

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0145

0.0109

0.0096

0.0102

0.0110

0.0118

0.0119

0.0125

0.0128

0.0129

0.0134

0.0153

 t-statistic

4.75

13.13

16.89

17.04

15.53

14.26

14.28

12.83

11.23

9.94

8.59

3.48

p-value

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

 R2

0.0042

0.0293

0.0396

0.0427

0.0383

0.0346

0.0332

0.0287

0.0223

0.0180

0.0138

0.0022

 Adjusted R2

0.0040

0.0291

0.0394

0.0425

0.0381

0.0344

0.0330

0.0285

0.0221

0.0178

0.0136

0.0020

 Proportion of effect explained by mood

52.9%

85.8%

91.5%

89.7%

90.1%

85.4%

85.6%

83.2%

80.1%

74.9%

69.4%

39.7%

Panel C: 1989-2006

 λ0

0.0329

-0.5721

-0.9736

-0.8388

-0.7833

-0.6458

-0.5338

-0.4260

-0.3319

-0.2370

-0.2208

0.1000

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0981

0.0728

0.0792

0.0649

0.0661

0.0709

0.0793

0.0899

0.0962

0.0978

0.0996

0.1018

 t-statistic

0.34

-7.86

-12.30

-12.91

-11.86

-9.11

-6.74

-4.74

-3.45

-2.42

-2.22

0.98

p-value

26.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

1.5%

2.7%

32.6%

 λ1

-0.0053

0.0922

0.1569

0.1352

0.1262

0.1041

0.0860

0.0686

0.0535

0.0382

0.0356

-0.0161

 Newey-West S.E.

0.0158

0.0112

0.0120

0.0097

0.0099

0.0108

0.0122

0.0139

0.0150

0.0153

0.0156

0.0164

 t-statistic

-0.34

8.23

13.09

13.96

12.78

9.68

7.06

4.93

3.57

2.49

2.28

-0.98

p-value

26.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.3%

2.3%

32.7%

 R2

0.0000

0.0117

0.0255

0.0297

0.0257

0.0162

0.0091

0.0047

0.0024

0.0012

0.0010

0.0002

 Adjusted R2

-0.0002

0.0115

0.0253

0.0294

0.0255

0.0160

0.0089

0.0045

0.0022

0.0010

0.0008

0.0000

 Proportion of effect explained by mood

NA

85.5%

89.9%

92.6%

92.1%

90.0%

84.9%

73.9%

59.4%

42.9%

46.5%

NA

  1. Table 5 provides analysis of the day-of-the-week effect with the simple-average mood template (reported in column 4 of Table 1) as the explanatory variable. The results are reported in three Panels corresponding to three subperiods. The upper part of each panel presents the regression statistics for each portfolio, the bottom part reports the ratios of the R2 of the mood variable regression to the R2 of the respective dummy variable regression. The results show that the regression coefficient of the mood variable is positive and statistically significant in the large majority of the cases. The ratios of the R2 of the mood variable regression to the R2 of the dummy variable regression suggest that mood remains a valid explanatory variable of the day-of-the-week effect across the three subperiods