Skip to main content

Table 22 Descriptive statistics of Copeland Rankings in Weight Simulation

From: Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation

Alternatives

Expert ranks

Weight simulation descriptive statistics

Mean

Min

Max

Median

St. Dev

Skewness

Kurtosis

A1

14

12.4454

5

20

12

2.3432

− 0.0426

2.9453

A2

11

13.2319

4

19

13

2.2903

− 0.4184

2.7513

A3

15

13.5037

6

19

14

2.2557

− 0.3012

2.3578

A4

7

7.2313

1

17

7

2.3426

0.2484

2.4672

A5

19

19.6687

16

22

19

1.0945

0.4084

2.6008

A6

9

7.7833

3

13

8

1.6627

0.1156

2.493

A7

17

13.6423

2

20

16

4.6595

− 1.0131

2.7693

A8

1

1.8071

1

8

1

1.0676

1.332

4.2077

A9

8

6.6669

1

15

7

3.2274

− 0.265

2.037

A10

16

14.6427

9

20

15

1.7116

− 0.0891

2.4046

A11

22

21.6537

13

22

22

1.0452

− 3.508

16.6084

A12

5

5.8904

1

16

6

2.0869

0.7693

3.8323

A13

12

12.6331

4

20

13

2.6104

− 0.2253

2.822

A14

13

15.6505

4

22

17

4.4763

− 0.9111

2.9777

A15

2

3.7398

1

16

3

2.1015

1.4435

5.4583

A16

3

2.1531

1

8

2

1.068

0.8817

3.6702

A17

18

17.3885

5

22

18

2.0525

− 1.2991

6.5046

A18

10

11.3093

3

17

11

2.5775

− 0.2768

2.6974

A19

4

6.2064

2

18

5

2.8622

0.8732

3.1273

A20

21

18.8462

6

22

19

2.2207

− 1.8286

7.1484

A21

20

20.2631

17

22

21

0.9535

− 1.156

3.8707

A22

6

6.6428

2

16

7

2.2562

0.0934

2.5143