Skip to main content
Financial Innovation

Table 16 Descriptive statistics of Copeland Rankings in Weight Simulation

From: Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation

Alternatives

Expert ranks

Weight simulation descriptive statistics

Mean

Min

Max

Median

St. Dev

Skewness

Kurtosis

A1

15

12.973

6

18

13

1.9042

− 0.3714

2.5638

A2

11

9.3736

3

16

10

2.7894

− 0.1651

2.5351

A3

10

10.4221

3

16

10

2.5827

− 0.0876

2.1858

A4

5

7.294

1

14

7

2.1622

0.0931

2.5019

A5

14

12.9732

8

17

13

1.3867

− 0.1807

2.5946

A6

4

4.7772

1

11

5

1.5355

0.1707

2.5285

A7

13

9.7378

1

17

11

4.7828

− 0.5818

2.0227

A8

2

2.8348

1

10

2

1.382

0.8966

3.5493

A9

7

6.2117

1

14

6

2.4965

0.2601

2.7581

A10

18

18.8486

17

22

19

1.0109

0.9267

3.0883

A11

21

20.5337

7

22

21

2.365

− 2.3146

8.9743

A12

6

8.5472

3

15

9

2.2103

− 0.1076

2.6017

A13

12

11.5672

6

17

12

2.1417

− 0.2554

2.2908

A14

8

13.0831

1

21

15

4.7476

− 0.6229

2.2041

A15

22

21.3901

16

22

21

0.7524

− 2.2596

12.7215

A16

3

2.337

1

9

2

1.4473

0.9229

3.3471

A17

20

19.9103

16

22

20

0.7987

− 0.4398

2.9848

A18

16

15.0497

7

19

15

1.6372

− 2.0969

8.4962

A19

9

6.5071

2

16

7

3.1271

0.2572

2.2118

A20

19

18.6741

15

22

19

1.0806

− 0.2462

2.66

A21

17

16.8626

15

21

17

0.5977

0.3927

4.4216

A22

1

3.0924

1

11

2

2.1646

0.9569

3.2564

Back to article page